Update: Here are some better pictures, including pictures showing the difference between Dec. 15's trial of this and a successful (and normal) trial on Nov. 16.
PSU Flow Cytometry
Tuesday, December 15, 2015
Fixable Yellow LIVE/DEAD stain showing a very strange result
Today an experiment which has been run multiple times on our Astrios was brought and looked REALLY weird. The culprit seems to be the Fixable Yellow LIVE/DEAD stain, though most likely due to some kind of mishandling.
Update: Here are some better pictures, including pictures showing the difference between Dec. 15's trial of this and a successful (and normal) trial on Nov. 16.
Update: Here are some better pictures, including pictures showing the difference between Dec. 15's trial of this and a successful (and normal) trial on Nov. 16.
Monday, June 15, 2015
a bad sorting experience with the Beckman Coulter Astrios
The other day I was running a typical cell sort on the Astrios from murine spleen cells, and I noticed a lot of liquid building up next to my collection tube. Upon further investigation (placing a slide across the open area) I saw THIS?!!!? WHY?????
Deflection looks fine to me (see below).
Deflection looks fine to me (see below).
Wednesday, July 10, 2013
Monday, May 6, 2013
what to do with this type of data?
A researcher brought this bone marrow sample from a GFP+ mouse. The unstained GFP+ cells have quite a bit of fluorescence in the 575nm and 610nm channels in addition to the 525nm. Here are some plots of the data:
First one is singlets from Wild-Type mouse (bone marrow):
First one is singlets from Wild-Type mouse (bone marrow):
Next is singlets from GFP+ mouse (bone marrow):
The bone marrow cells from GFP mice have a lot of fluorescence also in the PE (575nm) and PI (610nm) channels; PI isn't so important for our experiment (thus why the PI voltage probably isn't optimal), but PE is...another marker uses PE as a label:
For comparison, the wild-type cells:
I compensated the FITC and PE channels, thinking this was the optimal/best I could do given the circumstances. The assumption was that all of the cells are positive, and thus the cells centered around 10^2 are positives. (FlowJo warns me that 6% of the cells are on the chart edges):
I compensated the FITC and PE channels, thinking this was the optimal/best I could do given the circumstances. The assumption was that all of the cells are positive, and thus the cells centered around 10^2 are positives. (FlowJo warns me that 6% of the cells are on the chart edges):
I suppose I could compensate MORE? Maybe the cells centered around 10^2 are negative (different autofluorescence than the wild-type?), and the ones between 10^3-10^4 are the positives? If I do, now 58% of the cells are on the chart edges! And I still get a very weird vertical line at the right-hand side.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





















